Moscow Demands Staggering Amount in Compensation from Euroclear Regarding Seized Funds
Russia's monetary authority has announced it is pursuing compensation amounting to $230 billion from the securities depository Euroclear. This move represents a clear warning from the Kremlin regarding plans to utilize immobilized Russian sovereign assets to aid Ukraine.
The Legal Claim
Based on accounts in Russian news outlets, the central bank initiated a lawsuit last week for an estimated 18 trillion roubles. This sum corresponds to the aforementioned $230 billion demand.
European Union officials are set to decide in the coming days regarding a proposal to leverage approximately €210 billion in frozen Russian assets. This scheme entails providing Ukraine with a large loan to finance its defence and financial needs.
Most of these funds, amounting to €185 billion, reside at the Euroclear depository in Brussels. This institution serves as the main custodian for the Kremlin's immobilised sovereign wealth.
A Clash Over Legality
European Union officials have maintained that their proposal is legally sound. Their position is based on the fact that title of the sovereign wealth remains with Russia, even though it was frozen in European countries shortly after the full-scale military offensive of Ukraine.
Moscow, in contrast, has labeled any use of the assets as theft. Authorities have threatened retaliatory actions, such as confiscating European corporate holdings within Russia.
The head of Russia's sovereign wealth fund, who has assumed a key role in diplomatic talks, wrote on a social media platform that Russia "will prevail in court" and retrieve its funds. He warned that the European Union, the common currency, and Euroclear "will face consequences" from the plan.
Wider Implications
With statements interpreted as an attempt to drive a wedge between Europe and the United States, Dmitriev described the assets plan as "a vicious attack on the right to ownership and the international reserves system created by the United States."
The clearing house refused to comment on the new legal action. The institution has previously noted it is contending with over 100 lawsuits in Russian courts.
Legal Hurdles Ahead
While courts in EU countries are unlikely to enforce judgments from Russian tribunals, experts anticipate Moscow to pursue implementation in countries with closer relations to the Kremlin.
"The Bank of Russia could try to enforce a Russian court's decision against Euroclear in jurisdictions like China, Hong Kong, the UAE, Kazakhstan, and other sympathetic states, if relevant holdings can be identified," stated a legal expert from an NSP law firm.
EU Countermeasures
EU officials indicated they are working on measures to discourage other countries from assisting any Russian lawsuits against EU entities. Additionally, they are crafting protections to shield EU countries with investments in Russia from what they call "unlawful expropriation."
The Proposed Loan Mechanism
Under the detailed plan, the EU would provide an first €90 billion loan to Ukraine, using the cash earned from the frozen assets at Euroclear. Critically, Russia's legal claim on the underlying funds would stay unaffected.
Kyiv would only be required to return the money in the event that Russia consented to pay reparations for the vast destruction inflicted during the ongoing conflict.
Other Funding Ideas
Belgium, backed by Italy, Bulgaria, and Malta, has urged the EU to examine an alternative approach for financing Ukraine. This involves common EU debt issuance to secure a loan, backed by unused funds within the European budget.
This alternative move, however, demands unanimity among all 27 EU countries. Hungary's government, viewed as aligned with the Kremlin, has already signaled its opposition.
Speaking on Monday, the EU top diplomat, Kaja Kallas, said the reparations loan as "the most credible solution" for supporting Ukraine. "This mechanism is secured against the Russian frozen assets, which means it is not drawn from our public funds, which is equally important," she remarked. "Furthermore, it delivers a powerful message that when you cause all this damage to another nation, you must pay for the reparations."