🔗 Share this article

The ninth circuit court has upheld a prohibition on sending national guard in the Oregon city, after a latest court ruling.

Appeals Court Concurs to Reconsider Case

The federal appeals court ruled on Tuesday that it would rehear the legal dispute concerning the president’s authority with an expanded panel of eleven justices. The court also vacated a earlier ruling from a smaller judicial group that had sided with the federal government.

Ongoing Dispute Over Military Presence

This order represents the most recent turn in a protracted legal battle over whether the administration has the legal right and justification to deploy state military units in Portland. Approximately 200 federalized guard members have been in limbo since late September when the mobilization attempt was started in response to months of protests.

Conflicting Arguments

The federal government has claimed that federal officials at the ICE facility in south Portland were facing threats, while local authorities maintain that municipal police have control of the situation.

Contrary to characterizations of Portland as “war ravaged”, locals have been posting videos of lush hiking trails and a vibrant culinary culture, and planning activities such as an Emergency Naked Bike Ride against the “militarization of our city”.

Recent Legal Actions

The appeals court decision came after a US district judge in the city issued two legal injunctions this month – one preventing the federal control of the Oregon national guard, and another prohibiting the use of any military personnel in Oregon, after attempts to circumvent the first order by calling up out-of-state forces.

On Monday, the appeals court had put the first ruling on hold – permitting command of 200 Oregon national guard – but the second ruling remained in place, blocking the actual deployment of the troops.

En Banc Review

The latest ruling means the issue will be heard “en banc” – with all decisions under consideration together – by a group of 11 judges.

“This ruling demonstrates that the truth matters and that the judicial system are working to ensure government responsibility. The founding document restricts the executive authority, and Oregon’s communities cannot be treated as a training ground for unchecked federal authority,” stated the state attorney general in a statement.

“The court is sending a clear message: the president cannot dispatch the military into American urban areas without cause. We will continue protecting Oregon’s laws, values, and sovereignty as this legal proceeding progresses and our legal battle continues in the judicial system.”