🔗 Share this article

It's Black History Month in the Britain, and it seems it’s time for a reassessment. As time has passed, an celebration that began as a festivity and recollection of history, culture and the connections between global Black communities, has taken on a commercial tone, growing to encompass events where individuals of African heritage are compensated to address white audiences about hidden biases and “allyship”. The anti-racism rallies of the last decade created a surge in the business of displaying cultural sensitivity. Yet, that phase is now over. The wave has reached its height, leaving a sort of hollowed out legacy of what raising awareness is for.

The Origins of Black History Celebration

Originally observed in the America and its northern neighbor, Black History Month was established in 1962 as “Negro History Week” by African American historian Carter G. Woodson with multiple days of celebration and reflection in the February's second week. Black History Month evolved from this campaign and was formally inaugurated in 1970. Now it is celebrated not only in the North America in February, but also in October in the United Kingdom, Germany, Éire and the Holland.

The month has developed since its inception, placing less emphasis on the narratives of colonial slavery and struggles for equality, and increasingly on influential individuals of color in politics, culture, and activism, and widely honoring the contribution Black people have made to mold society. It is in educational institutions where Black History Month is most frequently marked, with talks and cultural events. But the way the observance is observed is a reflection of the contemporary political context. How it progresses is a instructive case in how assimilation leads to dismantling: the restructuring of Black History Month has hindered the point of it, which is to address systemic and institutional racism.

---

A Disconcerting Period

Few things illustrate how crucial it is to rethink Black History Month as much as the particular moment in which it falls this year. In the UK, a reemerging right-wing in the form of the Reform organization is top in opinion ratings. In the summer we witnessed the biggest extreme right demonstration in the UK's past. the Conservative leader, the person of color at the helm of the Conservative party, is a strong critic of the racial justice movement, and we are in a position where a elected representative gains confidence to declare that a lack of white people in certain urban areas is a cause for alarm. Meanwhile, far-right parties are expanding in the EU as a entirety.

In the United States, a massive attack against diversity initiatives and positive discrimination has been taken, frequently with success, to the top legal institutions of the country. A effort to erase the history of people of color and legacy from the records is under way. One of the political figure's first executive orders aimed at the National Museum of African American History and Culture, and the renowned cultural organization, claiming they of a organized and extensive campaign to alter the country's historical narrative” by representing the nation “as fundamentally prejudiced”.

Against this backdrop, the month symbolises how little it can be effective if it is confined to either routine organizational acknowledgments, or depoliticized festivities of former accomplishments, rather than addressing the situation of the current era. It also shows how its short period means that it is detached from the more extensive continuous action that is required. Denise Miller, a educator at a learning establishment, expressed it perfectly when she expressed apprehension about the fleeting superficial actions of the celebration. “The problem with embracing a superficial method”, she commented, “is that it frequently results in that Black History Month turns into a fleeting performance rather than a agent of progress.”

---

Reevaluating, Not Abandoning

Establishing how to adjust, modify and expand actions for equal rights and acknowledgment in such times of discouragement and concern is a treacherous thing. There is a inclination to just eliminate events including Black History Month completely, assuming they are simply not fit for purpose, or are relics of an era that has been ineffective.

However, regardless of the situation, Black History Month, and in fact the whole broad system and tradition of racial movements – grassroots Black Lives Matter organisations, inclusion and equity efforts, and indeed, including corporate presentations – represent an framework that a lot of work has been dedicated to. It is there not just to decay as the politics moves on (and in fact, deteriorates), but to be a vital organism.

So what would a contemporary active Black History Month appear as? To begin with, it would be extended beyond a brief observance: something that is distributed throughout the annual calendar (as certain organizations are already beginning to do), parts of its content (particularly around historic Black characters) included in school curriculums. It would also be a time that does not shy away from governmental matters, and allows opportunity for individuals, particularly young people, to share their anxieties and narratives. What value has mere awareness of the history when it ignores the present reality of extreme conservative demonstrations in the urban areas? Institutions who mark it should not be pacified with the passive language of hidden discrimination and awareness of “microaggressions”, but challenged by the threats that face all if fight against prejudice is not taken seriously. In short, Black History Month should be made contemporary, pressing, and responsive. Maybe an entire name rebrand is necessary – Black History is Now Month.